🔥 CVE-2026-42208 深度独立研究:源码审计 · 二次发现 · 利用方案
🔥 高危漏洞深度独立研究 · CVSS ≥ 9.8
CVE-2026-42208 深度独立研究:源码审计 · 二次发现 · 利用方案
📊 3 来源🔍 源码审计🧪 PoC
NVD-LatestCISA-KEVPoC-in-GitHub
🔍 源码独立审计
对 https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm 源码进行独立审计(置信度 0%)。
🧬 根因独立理解
(审计解析失败)
🛤️ 漏洞触发链路
🧪 PoC 复现
从 GitHub 公开仓库抓取的实际 PoC 代码(仓库)。
📋 代码元数据语言md来源ridhinva/litellm-sqli-scanner针对性✅ 已验证与漏洞相关(代码含 CVE 引用)依赖见代码注释/README用法详见代码注释中的使用说明
# LiteLLM SQL Injection Scanner
>
CVE-2026-42208 — SQL injection in LiteLLM Proxy
Detects and validates CVE-2026-42208: SQL injection vulnerability in LiteLLM Proxy's database layer.
For authorized security testing only.
## Features
- CVE-2026-42208 SQL injection detection
- LiteLLM Proxy version fingerprinting
- PoC validation payloads
- Structured JSON / text output
## Requirements
- Python 3.8+
## Usage
```bash
python litellm_scanner.py --url http://target:4000 # Scan a target
python litellm_scanner.py --url http://target:4000 --poc # Run PoC validation
python litellm_scanner.py --help # Help
```
## Legal
**For authorized testing only.** Only scan systems you own or have explicit written permission to test.
## Author
ridhinva — https://github.com/ridhinva⚔️ EXP 利用代码
截至分析时,Exploit-DB 未收录该 CVE 的公开利用代码。可利用上述 PoC 进行验证,或关注 Exploit-DB 更新。
🕵️ 检测指纹
针对该 CVE 的自动化检测规则(可直接用于扫描与审计)。
🛡️ Semgrep 审计规则: CVE-2026-42208.yaml
📋 代码元数据语言yaml来源rules/semgrep/CVE-2026-42208.yaml针对性✅ 按 CVE 匹配依赖semgrep用法semgrep --config CVE-2026-42208.yaml
rules:
- id: CVE-2026-42208-sqli-python
languages:
- python
severity: ERROR
message: "Potential SQL injection in LiteLLM proxy API key check via string formatting instead of parameterized query"
patterns:
- pattern-either:
- pattern: |f"SELECT * FROM $TABLE WHERE key = $VALUE"
pattern-not: |f"SELECT * FROM $TABLE WHERE key = ?"
fix: |
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM proxy_keys WHERE key = ?",
(key_value,))
metadata:
cwe: "CWE-89"
owasp: "A1: Injection"
technology: litellm
references:
- "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42208"
- id: CVE-2026-42208-sqli-python-format
languages:
- python
severity: ERROR
message: "Potential SQL injection via string formatting in database query"
patterns:
- pattern-either:
- pattern: $QUERY.format(key=$VALUE)
- pattern-not: $QUERY.format(key="?")
fix: |
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM proxy_keys WHERE key = ?",(key_value,))
metadata:
cwe: "CWE-89"
owasp: "A1: Injection"
technology: litellm
references:
- "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42208"🛡️ CodeQL 审计规则: CVE-2026-42208.ql
📋 代码元数据语言ql来源rules/codeql/CVE-2026-42208.ql针对性✅ 按 CVE 匹配依赖codeql用法codeql database run
/**
* @kind path-problem
* @id python/sql-injection/cve-2026-42208
* @name SQL injection in LiteLLM proxy database query
* @description User-controlled Authorization header value is concatenated into a database query instead of being passed as a parameter,
allowing SQL injection.
* @problem.severity error
* @tags security
* external/cwe/cwe-089
*/
import python
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.DataFlow
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.TaintTracking
import semmle.python.ApiGraphs
class SqlInjectionConfig extends TaintTracking::Configuration {SqlInjectionConfig() {this = "SqlInjectionConfig" }
override predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) {exists(DataFlow::Node n |n.asExpr() = any(Subscript s |s.getObject().(Name).getId() = "headers").getItem(_) or
source.asExpr() = any(Call c |c.getFunc().(Attribute).getAttrName() = "get" and
c.getFunc().(Attribute).getObject().(Name).getId() = "headers"
)
)
}override predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(DataFlow::Node n |n.asExpr() = any(Call c |c.getFunc().(Attribute).getAttrName() = "execute" or
c.getFunc().(Attribute).getAttrName() = "executemany" or
c.getFunc().(Attribute).getAttrName() = "executescript"
) and
sink = n
)
}override predicate isAdditionalTaintStep(DataFlow::Node node1,DataFlow::Node node2) {
any(FString fstr).getAFormattedValue() = node1.asExpr() and
node2.asExpr() = fstr
}}from DataFlow::PathNode source,DataFlow::PathNode sink,SqlInjectionConfig config
where config.hasFlowPath(source,sink)
select sink.getNode(),source,sink,"User-controlled input from Authorization header reaches database execute() call,allowing SQL injection."🤖 高危漏洞深度独立研究引擎生成 · 2026-08-11 03:02