🔥 CVE-2026-42208 深度独立研究:源码审计 · 二次发现 · 利用方案

🔥 高危漏洞深度独立研究 · CVSS ≥ 9.8

CVE-2026-42208 深度独立研究:源码审计 · 二次发现 · 利用方案

📊 3 来源🔍 源码审计🧪 PoC
NVD-LatestCISA-KEVPoC-in-GitHub

🔍 源码独立审计

https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm 源码进行独立审计(置信度 0%)。

🧬 根因独立理解

(审计解析失败)

🛤️ 漏洞触发链路

🧪 PoC 复现

从 GitHub 公开仓库抓取的实际 PoC 代码(仓库)。

📋 代码元数据语言md来源ridhinva/litellm-sqli-scanner针对性✅ 已验证与漏洞相关(代码含 CVE 引用)依赖见代码注释/README用法详见代码注释中的使用说明

# LiteLLM SQL Injection Scanner

>
CVE-2026-42208 — SQL injection in LiteLLM Proxy

Detects and validates CVE-2026-42208: SQL injection vulnerability in LiteLLM Proxy's database layer.
For authorized security testing only.

## Features

- CVE-2026-42208 SQL injection detection
- LiteLLM Proxy version fingerprinting
- PoC validation payloads
- Structured JSON / text output

## Requirements

- Python 3.8+

## Usage

```bash
python litellm_scanner.py --url http://target:4000      # Scan a target
python litellm_scanner.py --url http://target:4000 --poc # Run PoC validation
python litellm_scanner.py --help                         # Help
```

## Legal

**For authorized testing only.** Only scan systems you own or have explicit written permission to test.

## Author

ridhinva — https://github.com/ridhinva

⚔️ EXP 利用代码

截至分析时,Exploit-DB 未收录该 CVE 的公开利用代码。可利用上述 PoC 进行验证,或关注 Exploit-DB 更新。

🕵️ 检测指纹

针对该 CVE 的自动化检测规则(可直接用于扫描与审计)。

🛡️ Semgrep 审计规则: CVE-2026-42208.yaml

📋 代码元数据语言yaml来源rules/semgrep/CVE-2026-42208.yaml针对性✅ 按 CVE 匹配依赖semgrep用法semgrep --config CVE-2026-42208.yaml

rules:
  - id: CVE-2026-42208-sqli-python
    languages:
      - python
    severity: ERROR
    message: "Potential SQL injection in LiteLLM proxy API key check via string formatting instead of parameterized query"
    patterns:
      - pattern-either:
          - pattern: |f"SELECT * FROM $TABLE WHERE key = $VALUE"
    pattern-not: |f"SELECT * FROM $TABLE WHERE key = ?"
    fix: |
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM proxy_keys WHERE key = ?",
(key_value,))
    metadata:
      cwe: "CWE-89"
      owasp: "A1: Injection"
      technology: litellm
      references:
        - "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42208"
  - id: CVE-2026-42208-sqli-python-format
    languages:
      - python
    severity: ERROR
    message: "Potential SQL injection via string formatting in database query"
    patterns:
      - pattern-either:
          - pattern: $QUERY.format(key=$VALUE)
      - pattern-not: $QUERY.format(key="?")
    fix: |
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM proxy_keys WHERE key = ?",(key_value,))
    metadata:
      cwe: "CWE-89"
      owasp: "A1: Injection"
      technology: litellm
      references:
        - "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42208"

🛡️ CodeQL 审计规则: CVE-2026-42208.ql

📋 代码元数据语言ql来源rules/codeql/CVE-2026-42208.ql针对性✅ 按 CVE 匹配依赖codeql用法codeql database run

/**
 * @kind path-problem
 * @id python/sql-injection/cve-2026-42208
 * @name SQL injection in LiteLLM proxy database query
 * @description User-controlled Authorization header value is concatenated into a database query instead of being passed as a parameter,
allowing SQL injection.
 * @problem.severity error
 * @tags security
 *       external/cwe/cwe-089
 */
import python
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.DataFlow
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.TaintTracking
import semmle.python.ApiGraphs

class SqlInjectionConfig extends TaintTracking::Configuration {SqlInjectionConfig() {this = "SqlInjectionConfig" }
override predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) {exists(DataFlow::Node n |n.asExpr() = any(Subscript s |s.getObject().(Name).getId() = "headers").getItem(_) or
      source.asExpr() = any(Call c |c.getFunc().(Attribute).getAttrName() = "get" and
        c.getFunc().(Attribute).getObject().(Name).getId() = "headers"
      )
    )
  }override predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(DataFlow::Node n |n.asExpr() = any(Call c |c.getFunc().(Attribute).getAttrName() = "execute" or
        c.getFunc().(Attribute).getAttrName() = "executemany" or
        c.getFunc().(Attribute).getAttrName() = "executescript"
      ) and
      sink = n
    )
  }override predicate isAdditionalTaintStep(DataFlow::Node node1,DataFlow::Node node2) {
any(FString fstr).getAFormattedValue() = node1.asExpr() and
    node2.asExpr() = fstr
  }}from DataFlow::PathNode source,DataFlow::PathNode sink,SqlInjectionConfig config
where config.hasFlowPath(source,sink)
select sink.getNode(),source,sink,"User-controlled input from Authorization header reaches database execute() call,allowing SQL injection."

🤖 高危漏洞深度独立研究引擎生成 · 2026-08-11 03:02

[!] CONTACT_CHANNELS

如需商务合作、技术咨询或漏洞反馈,请通过以下离岸节点联系作者。

> PING_AUTHOR (@A1RedTeam)